{"id":135035,"date":"2023-12-05T17:49:02","date_gmt":"2023-12-05T17:49:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bluemull.com\/?p=135035"},"modified":"2023-12-05T17:49:02","modified_gmt":"2023-12-05T17:49:02","slug":"father-behind-monster-mansion-finally-starts-to-knock-it-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bluemull.com\/world-news\/father-behind-monster-mansion-finally-starts-to-knock-it-down\/","title":{"rendered":"Father behind monster mansion finally starts to knock it down"},"content":{"rendered":"
A father who built an ‘eyesore’ monster mansion without planning permission has finally begun to knock it down – three years after the council first ordered him to remove it.<\/p>\n
Delivery driver Gurwinder Singh,\u00a0was granted permission to build a modest extension to his semi-detached home\u00a0in Willenhall, West Midlands back in 2020 but instead he bulldozed the whole house to rebuild a four-bedroom home.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Following more than 95 complaints from local residents, he was later ordered to tear down the half-built home by Walsall Council.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Neighbours fumed the building work had made their ‘lives hell’ while others described the ‘eyesore’ as ‘like a Travelodge in the middle of a housing estate’.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Mr Singh appealed to the Planning Inspectorate but the council dismissed the appeal and upheld the original enforcement notice in July.\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
A father who built an ‘eyesore’ monster mansion without planning permission has finally begun to knock it down – three years after the council first ordered him to remove it<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Gurwinder Singh was granted permission to build an extension to his semi-detached home in Willenhall, West Midlands in 2020 but instead bulldozed the house to rebuild a four-bed home<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Following more than 95 complaints from local residents, he was later ordered to tear down the half-built home by Walsall Council<\/p>\n
He was also threatened with court action if he failed to comply with the enforcement notice by April next year.<\/p>\n
Work has now begun to demolish the structure and the first floor has been torn down, much to relief of surrounding residents in Sandringham Avenue.<\/p>\n
One neighbour, who did not wish to be named, said: ‘It’s about time – this has been going on for way too long and we just hope he sees it through now.<\/p>\n
‘We always said he’d never get away with it but as time went on you did wonder. It’s been hell living next to a construction site and half-built shell for three years.<\/p>\n
‘We just hope he rips the rest of it down and doesn’t leave another mess. We’ll be relieved when it’s all done and dusted.’<\/p>\n
Another resident said previously: ‘The house is bloody huge and looks like a horrible monster mansion.<\/p>\n
‘None of the other houses in this area are that big, what on earth was he thinking?<\/p>\n
‘It was at least three times the size of the original house. It looks like a sports hall.’<\/p>\n
The dad-of-two had never applied for planning permission and was only given the green light for a side extension to the existing 1960s house in 2020.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Neighbours fumed the building work had made their ‘lives hell’ while others described the ‘eyesore’ as ‘like a Travelodge in the middle of a housing estate’<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Work has now begun to demolish the structure and and the first floor has been torn down, much to relief of surrounding residents in Sandringham Avenue<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
The ‘monster mansion’ pictured before and after<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The dad-of-two had never applied for planning permission and was only given the green light for a side extension to the existing 1960s house in 2020<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
It is thought the brand new house would have cost in the region of \u00a3200,000 to build – and would have been the biggest property in the area<\/p>\n
It is thought the brand new house would have cost in the region of \u00a3200,000 to build – and would have been the biggest property in the area.<\/p>\n
When enforcement got involved, two retrospective planning applications were submitted – the first of which was withdrawn and the second refused.<\/p>\n
He was then given a series of five deadlines, with the first giving him until October 7 to demolish the building.<\/p>\n
He was also given until November 7 to stabilise the adjoining property and remove all below ground works by December 7.<\/p>\n
A spokesperson for Walsall Council said: ‘The Council is monitoring the situation to ensure all actions in the enforcement notice are complied with.<\/p>\n
‘We will review the need for potential further action once the final deadline for compliance has passed.<\/p>\n
‘We are aware that the owner has started demolition work and continue to monitor in accordance with the enforcement notice.<\/p>\n
‘The owner is undertaking works themselves at this stage.’<\/p>\n