Lea Michele Was ‘Self-Obsessed’ But Not Prejudiced, Former Colleague Says

Another side of the story. Lea Michele’s former colleague is speaking out about the allegations of mistreatment lodged against the Glee alum.

“Though she was completely self-obsessed toward everyone, she did not discriminate,” a source who worked with Michele, 33, tells Us Weekly exclusively. “It didn’t matter if you were young or old, black or white — it’s just kind of her world.”

According to the insider, the actress did not hide her feelings about those around her. “Things are seen through a lens, and it comes from a very protective place where obviously she’s been on guard. She’s fiery and she has more of an aggressive personality where most people would play weak or vulnerable or ask for sympathy and Lea does not do that,” the source alleges. “You know where you stand — for the most part — with her.”

The source claims that Michele’s behavior stemmed from her standing in the industry and the types of roles she portrayed. “In television, they hire really strong personalities because they create drama,” her former coworker says. “You don’t expect them not to be dramatic off set and in their own lives. That’s quite a switch to turn off.”

The Scream Queens alum came under fire earlier this week when fellow Glee alum Samantha Marie Ware accused her of making the work environment “a living hell.” Other costars chimed in from across Michele’s projects to corroborate the 28-year-old Hamilton alum’s allegations, while some defended the Mayor alum.

Amber Riley, for one, stopped short of claiming Michele’s actions were motivated by racial bias. “I’m not going to say that Lea Michele is racist. That’s not what I’m saying,” the actress, 34, explained during a Wednesday, June 3, Instagram Live video. “That was the assumption because of what’s going on right now in the world and it happened toward a black person. I’m not going to say that she’s racist.”

Earlier on Wednesday, the Same Time, Next Christmas star addressed the allegations for the first time. “While I don’t remember ever making this specific statement and I have never judged others by their background or color of their skin, that’s not really the point. What matters is that I clearly acted in ways which hurt other people,” she wrote on Instagram. “Whether it was my privileged position and perspective that caused me to be perceived as insensitive or inappropriate at times or whether it was just my immaturity and me just being unnecessarily difficult, I apologize for my behavior and for any pain which I have caused.”

For access to all our exclusive celebrity videos and interviews – Subscribe on YouTube!

Source: Read Full Article

Cat who was dumped with a plate of tortilla chips finally finds forever home

If you’re someone who voraciously reads all and any stories about cats, you’ll remember sweet kitty Linda, who was found dumped on a stranger’s doorstep with nothing but a plate of tortilla chips to eat.

Linda and her five-month-old kitten were ditched in a carry case on a stranger’s doorstep in 2019.

Thankfully the member of the public who found the pair of cats called Mayhew Animal Home, who were able to send out their animal welfare officers to help.

They brought the two cats into the shelter and Linda’s kitten, who staff named Stella, was quickly adopted.

Poor Linda was shaken up by her ordeal and showed signs of stress, hiding away from anyone who came near to her.

This made it difficult to find her a permanent family, and so to help Linda become comfortable with human contact she was moved into a foster home.

Now, over a year later, she’s finally found a forever family.

Alissa Johnson started fostering Linda over a year ago, and said that when the cat first moved in she was extremely shy and nervous.

But after months of patience and gentle care, Linda started to come out of her shell and learned to trust again.

‘It took Linda a good few months to really settle in with us,’ says Alissa. ‘Even the smallest, sudden noises would worry or scare her, so we were careful to be patient and understanding.

‘We would give her her own space and let her choose when to come up to us for cuddles and attention, and created a few spaces around the house where she could hide if she felt she needed to.

‘Though naturally, she chose her own ‘safe spot’, on an old Christmas jumper in the back of the wardrobe!

‘Once she realised she could trust us, Linda began to show us more of her adorable, sweet personality.

‘She went through a couple of medical issues when she was with us, and one night after spending a day at the vets, she slept on my chest all night. That was when I knew she’d decided we were okay.’

Despite Linda’s incredible progress, her road to adoption was paved with a few more troubles.

Unfortunately, she experienced a couple of unexpected medical scares which delayed her rehoming progress, but luckily Alissa was all too happy to continue looking after her until she was better.

When Linda was finally given the go-ahead to go up for adoption, it was a bittersweet moment for her proud foster carer.

It took a few tries to match Linda with the perfect person, but this week, finally, Linda was welcomed into her permanent home by her forever family, who have renamed her Minnie.

Alissa said: ‘When you sign up to foster, you know it’s going to be hard when the time comes to say goodbye. With Linda, it was even more difficult because we’ve gone on such a journey with her, and she is truly such a special little cat.

‘Though there were many times when we were tempted to sign the adoption papers ourselves, we knew Linda’s perfect match was out there, and we wanted to give her the chance to live the brand new life she really deserves. I know she is going to be so happy – but we’ll never forget her.’

Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing [email protected]

Share your views in the comments section below.

Source: Read Full Article

What was Richard Herd’s net worth when he died?

Veteran actor Richard Herd, who is best known for his roles on Seinfeld and Star Trek: Voyager, died at age 87 in Los Angeles on May 26, 2020, his wife, actor Patricia Crowder Herd, confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter. Herd died of complications related to cancer, per the outlet.

Although Herd racked up a ton of credits during his time in the entertainment industry (The China Syndrome, V: The Final Battle, T.J. Hooker) he made a splash playing George Costanza’s (Jason Alexander) boss, Mr. Wilhelm, for 11 episodes. “He was always doing things that never got done and always going over to Mr. Steinbrenner and apologizing to him,” Herd joked about his character, a hilariously incompetent New York Yankees exec, per Variety.

Herd, who was born in Boston, said in an interview with The Beaver County Times about the gig, “Seinfeld was one of the best jobs I ever had. There were no ‘stars’ on that show, they were all genuinely nice people to work with.” He added, “It got me a tremendous amount of recognition and still does because it plays all the time.”

Considering Herd enjoyed a long and consistent acting career, it’s fair some fans are curious to know what his net worth was when he died.

Richard Herd launched a new career before his death

One of Richard Herd’s first jobs as a kid was delivering newspapers, as he recalled to the Patriot Ledger in 2015, “I delivered to over a hundred houses, through rain, shine, or snow. On your bike on a snowy winter’s day, it could be pretty freaky, but I loved it because it helped pay for my first baseball mitt.”

Herd maintained this strong work ethic into adulthood, maintaining an acting career that spanned decades and included numerous television and movie appearances. In addition to China Syndrome, Herd had roles in All the Presidents Men, The Mule, and Get Out. “A wonderful man and a true professional,” Get Out director Jordan Peele tweeted about Herd.

The actor’s TV cameos included The O.C., Golden Girls, and NYPD Blue, to name just a few appearances.

It’s unclear what Herd’s net worth was at the time of his death, although we do know he became an accomplished artist before he passed. “It keeps the mind alive,” the star told the Patriot Ledger about his second passion, painting. “I leave a part of myself on every canvas, a bit of my soul, imperfections and all.” Some of Herd’s work is up for sale at the Bilotta Gallery as of this writing.

Sadly, Herd isn’t the only Seinfeld star who passed away in 2020 — Jerry Stiller died at age 92 in early May.

Source: Read Full Article

Dickens was cruel to his wife and hated his mother writes A.N. WILSON

Charles Dickens the misogynist: He championed family values – yet the novelist was cruel to his wife, hated his mother, had an affair… and obsessively re-enacted the murder of prostitute Nancy in Oliver Twist, writes A.N. WILSON

Charles Dickens had breakfasted early before setting out on one of his secret weekly visits to his mistress, Nelly Ternan. 

Small, trim, punctiliously neat, the 58-year-old whiskery figure would have been instantly recognised in almost any of the great cities of the world.

The most famous novelist was also one of the most famous human beings alive.

The fact that Dickens – a leading champion of Victorian family values – did not wish the world to know he had a mistress necessitated a life of constant subterfuge and deception, which had been the pattern of his existence for the previous 13 years since he first met Nelly when she was just 18, and acting on the West End stage.

Dickens’s journey on the morning of June 8, 1870, from his home near Rochester in Kent to the house which he rented for Nelly in Peckham, South London, was made by train and cab. 

Once reunited with his mistress, he paid her £15 for housekeeping. Then he suddenly collapsed.

The fact that Dickens – a leading champion of Victorian family values – did not wish the world to know he had a mistress necessitated a life of constant subterfuge and deception, which had been the pattern of his existence for the previous 13 years since he first met Nelly when she was just 18, and acting on the West End stage. She is pictured above

It does not require too much imagination to realise what had brought on his seizure.

Dickens, the father of ten children – nine of them living – was a man with a keen sexual appetite who brought to his love life the same hyper-exuberant energy that he expended on all his other favourite activities: acting, travelling, journalism, writing, charity work, entertaining his literary friends and fatherhood.

Faced with a crisis, Nelly acted quickly. If Dickens were to die – and it looked as though he might – it would be catastrophic for his reputation if it emerged that he had suffered a fatal collapse in the arms of his lover.

Enlisting the help of a nearby church caretaker and a hackney cab driver, Nelly arranged for Dickens’s semi-conscious body to be lifted on to a horse-drawn carriage. Within minutes the vehicle was on its way to Kent with the lovers on board.

What happened after this is not quite clear. Accounts vary, but the next thing we know for certain is that the novelist was lying on the floor of his dining room at home, with his housekeeper and children at his side. 

Nelly had by this time departed, although two accounts state that she was present with his family when Dickens, who had never fully recovered consciousness, died at 6.10pm the following day, June 9.

The official version of events would always be that England’s greatest novelist had died peacefully at home, surrounded by his children, busy working on his next book until the very end. Indeed, there are some scholars who still believe that this is what happened, and that the visit to Peckham never took place.

And yet the mystery remains.

Was his demise brought on by a frenzy of passion with the woman who had been his muse for so long? Or was the story no more than scandalous Victorian tittle-tattle?

As the 150th anniversary of his death approaches next month, the precise details of the last few hours of Dickens’s life remain uncertain. It is just one of many riddles surrounding this extraordinarily complex man.

Nowhere were these complications and contradictions more evident than in his attitude to women.

From the extreme cruelty that he showed to his long-suffering wife Catherine to his penchant for the company of very young and biddable women, his need to control and manipulate members of the opposite sex was a defining feature of his life. 

Verbal abuse, an obsession with tidiness and even with what women wore were all aspects of his complex personality. His need for control eventually took its ultimate expression in one of his most bizarre interests: hypnotism. 

Of all the women in his life, Dickens seems to have reserved his most bitter hatred for his mother, Elizabeth. As a child, Charles had led an idyllic life, much of it in rural Kent.

But when he was 12 years old disaster struck. His father John was sent to the debtors’ jail, the Marshalsea in South London – later the setting for the novelist’s masterpiece Little Dorrit – over a series of unpaid bills, taking his wife and several of his children with him.

To help support the family, Charles was removed from school and sent to work at Warren’s Blacking Factory near Charing Cross Station, sticking labels on jars of shoe polish and living on his own in lodgings. It was a traumatic experience that scarred him for ever, but also inspired some of his finest writing.

John’s incarceration lasted only three months, but the damage had been done. Charles returned to school, but from that point onward blamed his mother – particularly for her apparent rejection of him – and later poured all his anger and loathing into the hideous, neglectful mother figures that inhabit his novels.

By the end of their honeymoon, Catherine (above) had realised that although she would share his bed and, if he felt like it, his leisure, for the most part she would be on her own while he gave himself up to frantic activity

‘I never afterwards forgot. I shall never forget. I never can forget,’ he told his friend and biographer John Forster. Dickens’s mother had been incapable of giving him the love he craved, although she had shown great kindness to her other children. By the time she died in 1863, Dickens had not seen her for many months.

His quest to fill the emotional gap occupied his late teens and early 20s. He finally found what he was looking for in the blonde, pretty 19-year-old Catherine Hogarth, daughter of his boss at The Morning Chronicle newspaper in Fleet Street, where he worked as a reporter.

The courtship was swift and intense, and the couple were married in April 1836 at St Luke’s, Chelsea. Already, however, the idea of fame had Dickens in its grip.

By the end of their honeymoon, Catherine had realised that although she would share his bed and, if he felt like it, his leisure, for the most part she would be on her own while he gave himself up to frantic activity. It was to prove a recipe for misery.

Intriguing – and illuminating – details of the marriage survive. Dickens apparently felt unable to trust his wife to do the family’s shopping properly, frequently accompanying her to the butcher, fruiterer or fishmonger.

January 1857 found him writing to his friend William Wills, a colleague on Household Words magazine which Dickens edited, saying: ‘I am going to Newgate Market with Mrs Dickens after breakfast to shew [sic] her where to buy fowls’. 

This could be interpreted as affectionately companionable – or simply over-controlling.

For Dickens, neatness was an obsession. His daughter Mamie wrote after his death: ‘He made a point of visiting every room in the house once each morning and if a chair was out of its place, or a blind not quite straight, or a crumb left on the floor, woe betide the offender!’

But despite such quirks and eccentricities, several accounts suggest that for some of their marriage the couple enjoyed happy times, travelling to the United States, Italy and France together.

That said, by the time Catherine was in her forties – and petulant, red-faced and with bad teeth – cracks in the marriage were starting to show. Dickens began to punish her as he had felt the need to punish his mother.

So strained were the couple’s relations that Dickens’s ex-publisher Frederick Evans and colleague William Wills refused to go to his home. This, said Evans, was because they ‘could not stand his cruelty to his wife’. When asked by a friend what he meant, Evans explained: ‘Swearing at her in the presence of guests, children and servants – swearing often and fiercely. He is downright ferocious.’

According to the Victorian essayist Harriet Martineau: ‘Dickens had terrified and depressed [Catherine] into a dull condition’.

While Dickens himself became ever more energetic, Catherine sank into ‘indescribable lassitude’.

The final separation, when it came, was callous and brutal.

In the summer of 1857, Dickens wrote a letter to his wife’s maid Anne Cornelius. 

‘My dear Anne,’ he said, ‘I want some little changes made in the arrangement of my dressing room and the bathroom. And as I would rather not have them talked about by comparative strangers, I shall be much obliged to you, my old friend, if you will see them completed.

‘I wish to make the bathroom my washing room also. It will be therefore necessary to carry into the bathroom, to remain there, the two washing-stands from my dressing-room. Then to get rid altogether of the chest of drawers in the dressing-room, I want the recess of the doorway between the dressing-room and Mrs Dickens’s room fitted with plain white deal shelves, and closed in with a plain light deal door, painted white. The sooner it is done, the better.’

Without consulting his wife, Dickens was literally building a barrier between them.

It is especially chilling that he asserts his friendship with the maid in his pincer movement to force everyone in the household – servants as well as children – on to his side in the domestic warfare that he was planning.

By May 1858, Dickens had decided that it was impossible for him and Catherine to continue together in the same house.

In a letter to his Christian philanthropist friend Angela Burdett-Coutts he wrote: ‘I believe my marriage has been for years and years as miserable a one as ever was made. I believe that no two people were ever created, with such an impossibility of interest, sympathy, confidence, sentiment, tender union of any kind between them, as there is between my wife and me.’

He concluded his letter accusing Catherine of ‘the most miserable weaknesses and jealousies… Her mind has, at times, been certainly confused besides.’

Such language – of the sort which would make Catherine doubt her own sanity – suggests we are in the territory of the 1940 psychological thriller Gaslight.

It was at this point, according to their daughter Katey, that Dickens turned into a ‘madman’. An example of his turbulent state of mind was, she said, his decision to place in several national newspapers an announcement of his marriage break-up, referring to the ‘peculiarity of her [Catherine’s] character’.

In later years, Katey suggested that whoever her father had married, it would have been a disaster. ‘He did not understand women,’ she said. ‘This [episode] brought out all that was worst – all that was weakest in him. He did not care a damn what happened to any of us.’

In Dickens’s mind, Catherine had taken the place of the mother he could never forgive.

The only escape was to find a nymph dream, a girl-woman of the kind who flitted ceaselessly across the pages of his novels, and who had always so appealed to him – somebody who could never turn out to be his abusive mother in disguise.

Nelly Ternan, young, malleable and beautiful, was that person. The years of their relationship were to prove his most productive and successful. And yet as so often with Dickens, those startling contrasts and contradictions were at play.

Ever a campaigner for social justice and champion of the underdog, he had proposed and helped set up in 1847 a refuge for ‘fallen women’, many of them prostitutes. His idea was that, after the women had been rescued, they would be enabled to travel to Australia to begin a new life.

Despite the other heavy demands on his time, Dickens had thrown himself into the project with gusto. It was he who talked to the builders about alterations to the property he chose in West London. It was he who went shopping for the furniture, the bookcases and the books.

It was he who bought the linen, the carpets and curtains; it was even he who chose the women’s clothes. 

‘I have made them as cheerful in appearance as they reasonably could be – at the same time very neat and modest,’ he wrote. The distinction between a desire to control and a desire to benefit the young women involved is a fine one.

Ever a campaigner for social justice and champion of the underdog, he had proposed and helped set up in 1847 a refuge for ‘fallen women’, many of them prostitutes

Even more than his novels, his home for fallen women would be a world of which he could take total charge. It proved hugely successful, establishing a number of women in happy marriages and giving them exactly the fresh start he had envisaged.

Here, once again, is the paradox of Charles Dickens: half good cop, half bad.

As if he were not busy enough, in the late 1830s, Dickens had become fascinated with the new fad of mesmerism. 

A relatively new concept in Britain, it was the brainchild of the German doctor Anton Mesmer, who proposed that a trance-like state induced by an expert practitioner could be used to cure all manner of ailments.

Dickens was enthralled, befriending mesmerism’s leading specialist in London, John Elliotson, a professor of medicine. From Elliotson and others Dickens learned how to perform the movements of mesmerism. On a trip to Boston in the US during happier times with his wife in 1842, he tried it out on her in front of two witnesses.

Within six minutes of passing his hands around her head, Catherine became hysterical. She then fell fast asleep. A somewhat startled Dickens found, however, that he could wake her easily by moving his thumbs over her eyebrows, and by blowing gently on her face.

It had been a shock, but soon he was regularly hypnotising Catherine and other family members and friends. He even tried out his powers on a Frenchwoman called Madame de la Rue he met in Italy who was looking for a cure for tics and hallucinations.

Although it is not entirely clear whether he slept with her, Dickens’s intimacy with her caused Catherine enormous distress. Indeed, she was so disturbed by the amount of time Dickens was spending in Mme de la Rue’s bedroom at all hours of the day and night in the cause of mesmerism that he had to take his wife away for a few days to calm what he claimed was her ‘unreasonable behaviour’.

A sexual element of control was undoubtedly strong in all this, with contemporary accounts suggesting that Dickens found it most exciting to perform his mesmeric tricks on women.

It was not be the last time that his overwhelming desire for control would be played out in a public and highly dramatic fashion.

For, in 1858, Dickens had begun touring Britain with one-man performances of his most famous novels. It was these shows that brought him global stardom and increased his already considerable wealth.

His favourite portrayal was that of the brutal death of the prostitute Nancy at the hands of her lover, Bill Sikes, from his novel Oliver Twist. In 1863, he confessed that, privately, he had performed an imaginary re-enactment of Nancy’s killing ‘but I have got something so horrible out of it that I am afraid to try it in public’.

His manager George Dolby was fiercely against the plan to include the murder scene in public as it was inappropriate for a show meant to appeal to all ages, and because of its likely effect on Dickens’ health.

Dickens’ family were equally opposed. His son Charley later told how he was working in the library at the family home when he heard the sound of violence taking place outside in the garden. It sounded as if a tramp was beating his wife.

As the noise continued – alternately brutal shouts and female screaming – Charley decided to intervene, only to find his father outside on the lawn murdering an imaginary Nancy with ferocious gestures.

When Dickens asked his son what he thought, Charley replied: ‘It is the best thing I’ve ever seen. But don’t do it.’

But Dickens had made up his mind. He went ahead and performed 28 renditions of Nancy’s murder. It became an obsession with him.

He told his friend William Wills that his performance had a transformative physical effect upon him. ‘My ordinary pulse is 72 and it runs up under this effort to 112,’ he wrote. ‘Besides which, it takes me ten or twelve minutes to get my mind back at all: I being in the meantime like the man who lost the fight.’

After the scene was finished, there would be total silence in the hall. Dickens then went backstage, often walking with difficulty, and would be forced to lie on a sofa for some minutes before he once more became capable of speech. He would recover and ‘after a glass of champagne would go on the platform again for the final reading’.

It is almost as if Dickens had released a genie from the bottle of whose sexually violent existence he had been scarcely aware. Indeed, he liked to joke about his ‘murderous instincts’ and his re-enactment of the killing. ‘I have a vague sensation,’ he said, ‘of being “wanted” as I walk about the streets.’

The inevitable happened at Chester in April 1869 when Dickens had a minor stroke on stage. A doctor was summoned, and ordered that the tour be cancelled forthwith.

But Dickens’ obsession with the scene refused to leave him. Months after the shows had ended, and shortly before his death a year later, he was discovered performing the slaying of Nancy once again in the privacy of his own garden.

IN THE week before his fateful final trip to his mistress Nelly in Peckham, Dickens and his daughter Katey sat up until 3am talking. Relaxed after a pleasant dinner followed by brandy and cigars, he confided in her about his relationships, and his regrets.

‘He wished he had been a better father, a better man,’ she later recalled.

Many of those who knew him might well have agreed. A flawed genius, perhaps – but one whose writings a century and a half after his passing continue to enthral and delight.

© A. N. Wilson, 2020

The Mystery Of Charles Dickens is published by Atlantic on June 4, priced £17.99.

Source: Read Full Article

Jose Mourinho admits he was ‘very violent’ and a ‘d***head’ to his Inter Milan treble winners – The Sun

JOSE MOURINHO admits he was a “d***head” to his Inter Milan Treble-winning side of 2010.

The Spurs boss also revealed he was violent with his players and told them “they had won the Scudetto of s**t” following a defeat to Bergamo.

Mourinho won the Serie A title, the Coppa Italia and the Champions League in 2009-10.

The Portuguese, 57, said: “I’m never fake, I’m original. It’s me and that’s it. I was also a d***head but that was me.”

Mourinho lost his cool with his Inter squad following the 3-1 defeat to Bergamo in January 2009.

He told Gazzetta dello Sport: “I was very violent with the players — I told them they had won the Scudetto of s**t.

“It was only afterwards I understood I had hurt them and I apologised.”

Despite the highs and lows, the former Chelsea and Manchester United chief never felt as comfortable as he did in the San Siro dugout.

And the high point of his stay was the 2-0 win over Bayern Munich in the Champions League final.

He added: “I was at my best when I felt at home.

“That’s why, on May 22 in Madrid, I was content to experience the happiness of others, all the way from president Massimo Moratti to the people in the warehouse.

“I used to always think of myself first. At Inter, it was never like that.

“When you become a father, you understand that someone is more important than you.

“Just the other day I spoke to Alessio, my driver. That’s Inter for me. These are my people.”

Last night Inter announced their Uefa Cup-winning coach Gigi Simoni had died, aged 81.

Source: Read Full Article

What Was Hayley Kiyoko Been in Besides Disney Channel's 'Lemonade Mouth'?

Some Disney fans know her as the spunky and sassy Stella Yamada from Lemonade Mouth. Since then, though, actress and artist Hayley Kiyoko has been an out, loud, and proud member of the LGBTQ community. Here’s what Hayley Kiyoko has been up to since starring in a Disney Channel original movie. 

Hayley Kiyoko is a longtime supporter and member of the LGBTQ community

Some fans refer to her as the “Lesbian Jesus.” Once Hayley Kiyoko opened up about her sexuality and released her song “Girls Like Girls” back in 2015, a wave of support came from fans. Since then, she’s spoken at an event for The Trevor Project and advocated for the LGBTQ community. 

“I just wanted to be a musician and perform at the Staples Center. That was the goal. It wasn’t like, oh I’m going to sing about women and express myself,” Hayley Kiyoko said during an interview with W Magazine. “It was very narrow-minded almost, kind of, what I was going to do. And now I just have a whole different perspective on life and what’s important to me. It’s a really cool surprise in life.”

Hayley Kiyoko previously acted in the Disney Channel original movie, ‘Lemonade Mouth’

Perhaps Hayley Kiyoko is best known for appearing in one Disney Channel original movie as the free-spirited, guitar-playing Stella Yamada. Besides starring in Lemonade Mouth, Hayley Kiyoko appeared in a few other Disney Channel-related projects, including the television series’ Wizards of Waverly Place and Zeke and Luther. 

As far as movies go, the actress appeared in Insidious: Chapter 3, Jem and the Holograms, and Hello, My Name is Frank. She still has time to dominate social media, though. Recently, Hayley Kiyoko shared a TikTok of herself singing “Determinate” to help keep morale high during this time of social distancing.

Hayley Kiyoko was on the finale of ‘RuPaul’s Secret Celebrity Drag Race’

In a surprise twist, Hayley Kiyoko appeared on the finale of Secret Celebrity Drag Race. As one of the celebrities, she was mentored by the former Drag Race contestants, transforming into a drag version of herself along the way. 

This would be the first time that Hayley Kiyoko appeared on this reality competition series or one of its spinoffs. Once the news broke, fans shared their excitement at Hayley Kiyoko’s involvement. One Twitter user said, “the only reason I’m excited for Celebrity Drag Race is Nico Tortorella and Hayley Kiyoko… like literally, that’s it.”

“Hayley Kiyoko being on Celebrity Drag Race will be the only valid thing about Celebrity Drag Race,” another Twitter user wrote about the singer.

This wouldn’t be the first time that a former Disney star shared their love for the reality competition series. Miley Cyrus was the first celebrity guest judge on RuPaul’s Drag Race season 11, even dressing in drag for a large portion of the first episode. Demi Lovato was a guest judge on season 7.

Music by Hayley Kiyoko, including the 2020 release “Missed Calls,” is available on Spotify, Apple Music, and most major streaming platforms. Episodes of RuPaul’s Drag Race season 12 premiere on a weekly basis. 

RELATED: Meet the Queens Sashaying Back Into the Werk Room for ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race: All-Stars 5’

Source: Read Full Article

Tristan Thompson Was "Open" With Khloé Kardashian About Having to Take That Paternity Test

Hello and welcome back to the saga that is Tristan Thompson maybe being the father of another baby!

For those of you who are just joining us, a brief recap: Earlier this week, it was revealed that Tristan took two paternity tests after a woman named Kimberly Alexander claimed that he’s the father of her child. Both paternity tests came back negative, but apparently Kimberly is still claiming that Tristan is her baby daddy, cause Tristan and Khloé Kardashian’s lawyer had to send her a cease-and-desist letter, claiming she was spreading “outrageous lies” and “ridiculous fictional conspiracy theories” that Tristan falsified the paternity tests.

It’s not clear why Tristan and Khloé are sharing a lawyer (cue: rumors that they’re getting back together/the fact that I know nothing about law), but we do have some new intel about how this went down between the former couple. A source tells People, “Tristan has been open with Khloé from the beginning when it comes to the paternity test. He told her that he needed to take the test, but also that he didn’t believe that he is the dad.”

And apparently, the paternity claim hasn’t changed their co-parenting relationship. The source adds, “Khloé and Tristan have both worked hard to get to the point where they are now. Regardless of the issues that Khloé has had with Tristan, he has always been a responsible and great dad. Khloé will continue to support Tristan.”

This comes after the false rumors that Khloé and Tristan are expecting a second child together, so needless to say, this week has produced a lot of content for the next season of KUWTK!

Source: Read Full Article

What Was TLC'S Lisa 'Left Eye' Lopes' Net Worth at the Time of Her Death?

TLC’s Lisa “Left Eye” Lopes was a pivotal part of the group’s success in the early 1990s. With Lopes providing the raps, TLC produced four multi-platinum albums and 9 top-10 hits. But Lopes’ journey tragically ended in the spring of 2002 when the artist was involved in a fatal car accident. Here’s a look at how much Lopes was worth at the time of her death.

Lopes’s rise to fame

Left Eye formed TLC alongside Tionne “T-Boz” Watkinsand Rozonda “Chilli” Thomas shortly after she moved to Atlanta. The group’sfirst album, Ooooooohhh… On the TLC Tip, was released in 1992 andfeatured the popular tracks, “Ain’t 2 Proud 2 Beg,” “What AboutYour Friends,” and “Baby-Baby-Baby.”

The trio captivated listeners with their trendy hip-pop beats, which were created by Dallas Austin and Jermaine Dupri, and their colorful b-girl looks. While Watkins and Thomas provided the vocals, Lopes immediately made a name for herself as the group’s resident rapper.

TLC released their next big album two years later. The LP, titledCrazysexycool, was another massive hit with songs like“Waterfalls,” and “Creep.” The album was another commercialsuccess for the women, who were quickly becoming icons in their own rights.

But when they weren’t making music, the group publicly feuded with each other, their record label, and their manager, Perri “Pebbles” Reid. And in 1994, Lopes made headlines when she burned down her former boyfriend, Andre Rison’s, house.

Inside Lisa ‘Left Eye’ Lopes’ tragic death

Lopes had trouble launching a solo album, Supernova, in2001, and was working on a follow-up LP in 2002 when her life tragically ended.

According to Billboard,Lopes died in a car accident while staying at her home in Honduras. The rapperwas a frequent visitor to the country and often attended spiritual cleanses ata healing village in the area.

Left Eye reportedly rented a car a few hours away from the city of Tegucigalpa. We do not know who was driving at the time of the incident, but the vehicle rolled over while traveling on a highway. There were seven other passengers in the car, all of whom only sustained minor injuries.

“The car rolled for reasons that we still don’t know, andthat are being investigated,” a police officer said at the time of Lopes’sdeath.

Following her death, Watkins and Thomas finished her final album,which was titled 3D. TLC vowed to break up after the albums’ release,but the group ultimately stayed together and continued to make music.

How much was Left Eye worth?

Over the years, Lopes managed to amass a good fortune, most ofwhich came from her music sales. According to CelebrityNet Worth, Lopes was worth around $5 million at the time of hertragic death.

TLC’s first album sold over six million copies and the group’ssecond offering hit the 15 million mark. Following the release of their thirdalbum, however, the group showed signs of trouble and it wasn’t long beforethey broke up.

Lopes, of course, went on to release a solo album and was in themiddle of her second LP when she passed away. It is unclear how much Lopes madefrom her first solo album, but the project was not released in the UnitedStates because it did poorly overseas.

When Lopes was in Honduras in 2002, she was actually filming a documentary. The director of the film, Lauren Lazin, captured a lot of footage of her final days, including the night of her fatal accident.

VH-1 released the documentary back in 2007 with the title LastDays of Left Eye. Lopes was only 30 years old when she died and did nothave any children.

Source: Read Full Article

What was Corey La Barrie’s cause of death? – The Sun

FANS of YouTubber Corey La Barrie are mourning his tragic death, aged just 25.

We take a look at his career in the spotlight and how he came to die so young.

Who was Corey La Barrie?

YouTubber Corey was born in Adelaide, Australia on May 10, 1995.

He was a popular social media influencer who was widely known for posting funny videos such as challenges, often alongside friends.

His self-titled YouTube channel earned more than 300,000 subscribers.

In 2019, he made his reality TV debut on the series The Reality House.

What was Corey La Barrie's cause of death?

Corey died on his birthday on May 10, 2020 in LA, where he had been living at the time.

His cause of death is yet to be determined but he was involved in a fatal car crash at 9.20pm and was taken to a local hospital, where he sadly succumbed to his injuries.

It is now reported that the alleged driver of the car that Corey was travelling in was Ink Master star Daniel Silva – it is reported he is set to be charged with 'felony murder'.

What tributes have been made for Corey La Barrie?

Corey's last tweet thanked people for their "birthday wishes".

Fans are now replying to it with thoughts of mourning.

One wrote: “Corey's loss will be remembered. My condolences to his friends, family & audience during their grief.”

Another shared: “Corey. Rest easy buddy. You were gone waaaay too soon. You will always be in our hearts.”




Source: Read Full Article

Hilarie Burton was ‘severely depressed’ after first miscarriage

Hilarie Burton says she was “severely depressed” after she suffered the first of three miscarriages and she and husband Jeffrey Dean Morgan expressed their grief in very different ways.

“The false narrative that gets projected, especially by the celebrity angle is, we went through this hard thing and it brought us closer together,” the 38-year-old “One Tree Hill” actress told Us Weekly in a new interview. “I felt like a total failure because that wasn’t happening for me.”

She continued, “Until you go through that first really horrible thing together, you don’t know how your partner is going to react. You don’t know what they need.”

Burton, who shares two children — a 10-year-old son named Gus and a 2-year-old daughter named George — with “The Walking Dead” actor, said that while he needed her to “be strong and calm,” she needed “to slam doors and cry really hard and howl.”

Now, the actress is bearing all in her new memoir, “The Rural Diaries: Love, Livestock, and Big Life Lessons Down on Mischief Farm,” explaining the book is her way of “copping to my own crap.”

“I did have postpartum with my son,” she said. “I didn’t know I did because I was in the fog of it, but I wasn’t fun to be around and I was severely depressed after I had my first miscarriage … I can look at it now and see how self-destructive I was.”

She went on to praise Morgan, whom she began dating in 2009 and married in 2019.

“He was so generous with his own privacy in allowing me to put this out there,” she said. “Because it isn’t just me, it’s our story. And I can’t thank him enough for letting me process in this way.”

Burton first revealed the miscarriages in an Instagram post after George was born in 2018.

It took a long time for Jeffrey and I to have this baby,” she wrote at the time. “The first time I got pregnant, it took a year and a half. I surprised him on Christmas with baby Seahawk booties. We cried. We celebrated. We picked out names. And we lost that baby. More losses followed, and as so many couples know, it was heartbreaking. It still is heartbreaking.”

Source: Read Full Article